Radiens provides high-density recording solutions for Neuropixels, SiNAPS, and NeuroNexus high-channel-count probes.
High-density recording places electrode sites close enough, and in enough number, that a single neuron lands on several sites at once. That redundancy is what lets a sorter tell one unit from its neighbours, and it is what turns a recording into a map of a circuit rather than a handful of channels. It sets up the two practical problems this page is about: capturing clean signal across every site, and handling the data and the sorting once the channel count is high.
These are the key requirements for high-density recording in Radiens.
What every high-density workflow needs, whatever the probe:
Getting clean signal off a dense probe, at the rig:
Turning a dense recording into something ready to analyze:
Making results from a high-density dataset:
Site pitch decides what you can resolve: whether one neuron lands on several sites at once, because that redundancy is what lets a sorter separate it from its neighbour. Channel count decides how much of the circuit you cover at that pitch — and what the session costs you in data, storage and sorting time. A 1,024-site probe at coarse pitch is a wide survey. A 256-site probe at fine pitch is a careful look at one place. Neither is denser in the sense that matters until you have said which of the two problems you have.
3.8 MB/s — about 111 GB per session.
10.2 MB/s — about 295 GB per session.
23.0 MB/s — about 664 GB per session.
41.0 MB/s — about 1.18 TB per session.
Ten animals at 1,024 channels for two hours each is roughly 3 TB before anything is analysed. A dense cohort is a storage project before it is an analysis project, and sizing follows throughput — channels times sample rate — rather than channel count alone.
Against each site's own baseline rather than a nominal figure. Residue from cleaning is the common cause, and it is reversible.
Near-uniform is what you want. Structure that matches the probe's own geometry — a shank, a column, a connector's worth of channels — points at hardware, not tissue.
On a few sites spread across the array. Thirty seconds here saves a session you would otherwise finish and distrust.
Record directly from Neuropixels and SiNAPS, drive 1,024+ channels through XDAQ, and read high-density data from any major system — then see and sort it at scale.
Native acquisition — Neuropixels & SiNAPS
Native Neuropixels and SiNAPS acquisition (Pro). NeuroNexus DAQ acquisition — XDAQ at 1,024+ channels, and SmartBox — is free at every tier.
Any electrode, natively modeled
Native probe models for NeuroNexus probes and both CMOS active-probe families; MEAs and any other electrode via the custom model builder (free).
See and sort at scale
Live signal-quality and spectral monitoring across every channel; probe-specific sorting and cluster-quality metrics (Pro).

Read and model high density for free; add native acquisition and scale at Pro.
Dense recordings stay on your own storage — nothing uploaded, whatever the channel count.
Monitor any data stream in real time; read most vendor formats with no conversion step.
Signal-quality metrics across every channel, so you triage a dense recording before you trust it.
Every result carries an ID and provenance, so a high-density analysis re-derives itself.
Work back from what you are trying to tell apart. If two neurons must be separated, you need sites closer together than the distance over which their waveforms differ — that is a pitch question, and roughly 30 µm is where single-unit isolation becomes routine. If you need to see more of a circuit rather than resolve more finely within it, that is a count-and-shank question and pitch can stay where it is. Buying count when you needed pitch is the common and expensive mistake.
Usually, yes. Radiens reads most vendor formats with no conversion step and tails a file live while it is being written, so the analysis software and the acquisition hardware are separable decisions. A lab that has already bought a working acquisition system rarely needs to replace it to change what it can get out of the recordings.
Not acquisition — storage and interpretation. A 1,024-channel probe at 20 kHz writes about 147 GB an hour, so a cohort becomes a storage project quickly, and sorting parameters become part of the method rather than a setting, because at that scale two threshold choices differ by thousands of units. Both are planning problems, which is why they are worth naming before the first surgery.
Yes — native Neuropixels acquisition (Pro) and native read of Neuropixels/SpikeGLX data (free), with a native probe model for spatially-registered views and probe-specific spike sorting.
Yes — native SiNAPS control for acquisition (Pro), plus the native probe model for on-probe visualization and probe-specific sorting.
1,024+ channels through XDAQ, with live monitoring and signal-quality readout across every channel.
Yes — cross-vendor probe and DAQ support reads high-density files from most major systems (Intan, SpikeGLX, Open Ephys, TDT, Plexon, NWB) with no conversion step.
Build it: the custom electrode model builder (free) creates a native model for MEAs and any other electrode, so on-probe views and coordinates work for your geometry.
No — Radiens is local-first. Dense recordings run on your own workstation against your own storage; nothing is uploaded.